Essay on Arguments for Gun Control in America

Firearms have become an unquestionably significant part of American culture. They have been with us in the darkest and lightest of times for centuries upon centuries. The U.S. even incorporated the topic of guns in its constitution under the Bill of Rights. As a result of it being a right for US citizens, there have been continuous quarrels throughout the nation on whether it should be controlled or not. Even though guns were indicated to protect citizens, it has also assisted in creating a harmful environment. The iniquity that people have with firearms is the foundation of why America must propose strict gun control laws.

Guns and Gun Control in America: The Past and the Present

Guns were intended to symbolize pride and power for American citizens. However, these assault weapons have ended and continue to end a tremendous amount of lives out of aggression and hatred. Following such tragedies, gun control is gradually becoming a high demand on account of marches and movements. Numerous states have already set some guidelines for an individual to receive a firearm. Yet, not every state in America is approaching gun control with the same attentive manner. For instance, USA Today provides an article with statistical information on the number of deaths in a state due to assault weapons. Connecticut, which boasts a more inhibited gun usage, reported a total of 172 firearm-related deaths in 2016. Florida, however, reported a staggering 2,704 firearm-related casualties in the same year (Frohlich and Harrington). This factual piece of evidence indicates that states are divergent with their gun policies. Although, that should not be the case.

Majority of firearms that are purchased by citizens are intended to conserve the safety of their family and household. Which is a reasonable justification since families just desire to keep one another protected. But self-defense is almost never the instance when it comes down to casualties caused by firearms that are highlighted by the media. National Public Radio, Inc. shared an article by Samantha Raphelson, which informs her audience of police investigation factors. Raphelson includes certain statistical details in her work, such as, “people defended themselves with a gun in nearly 0.9 percent of crimes from 2007 to 2011.” It is obvious that the individuals who choose to use their firearms as a means to cause innocent people harm, rather than a way to defend themselves from danger, did not in any way comprehend the responsibility of owning such a weapon and the circumstances in which their uses would be appropriate.

What Could Be Done in Terms of Gun Control Today?

One of the main arguments for this controversial gun control topic is whether or not gun restrictions will benefit to a decrease in crimes. Senator Chris Murphy is purely convinced that it will indeed lower crime rates. On CNN’s “State of the Union”, Murphy explained on his reasoning of believing that. The Senator claims, “What we know is that states that have tougher gun laws, that keep criminals from getting guns, that keep those dangerous weapons like AR-15s out of the hands of civilians, have dramatically lower rates of gun violence.” To support his perspective, incorporating an increase of procedures in order to obtain a firearm will decrease the number of individuals that purchase a gun. And it would be bound to alternate the society into a safer environment.

There is factual proof that creating stricter gun laws will have an immensely positive result for society. Firearm weapons should be taken seriously since they are remarkably life-threatening. Increasing the amount of procedures to legally have access to a gun in an individual’s home would help prevent the firearms from landing in the wrong hands.


Comments are Disabled